Sunday 13 July 2008

Thoughts about the Weekend Today, 12th July 2008

I thought the Weekend Today had something worthwhile. Ravi Veloo has decided somehow to stick his/her neck out and question the values today. Sorry, a bit of an ignoramus at following the news and the columnists, so can't really know the gender. Anyway, the interesting thing is that the Grand Old Man also features a few pages after that, the usual stuff about our talent, leadership and future challenges - all the usual nonsense about why liberal democracy won't really work, yah dah yah dah...

I'm sure all of these isn't new to you guys at all. In fact, its all old stuff that gets recycled over and over again, depending on the 'national mood'. Anyway, was mulling on such things when it just hit me...

I had this thought that the source of all these nonsense comes from a few things. We tend to think that administrators in Singapore are all-powerful people, and if we talk some sense into them, maybe they will do the right thing and move things in a better direction. I guess I'm slow to this, but I realise that our administrators are just slave to this system that emphasizes ECONOMICS above everything else - ie, GDP growth, manufacturing growth, numbers and more numbers and such. And its not just that - they see only a few set of these numbers, so they probably won't do anything about rise in cost of living, homeless rates, bankruptcy rates, etc. The former we are tired of, and the latter worries us most. Naturally, we tend to think that, if the latter is becoming so poisonous, why isn't the bigshots doing anything about it? It really is simply this - to the administrators, the latter issues are simply irrelevant and inconsequential. To pander to us, they set up committees and pretend to do something, you know, give some million there, give another million here, and pretend the issue is solved. In actual fact, people couldn't give a damn, or forced not to give a damn. Their hands are tied, shackled to the single-mindedness of a constructed 'economic necessity'. Of course, it doesn't help that some Grand Old Man is still alive and his Golden Army of Ancient Warriors are still alive, or reincarnated in various forms. But the keypoint is, because of this single-mindedness, everything else gets pushed to the periphery, even debates about national identity and our future... Think about it - all our social conditioning, all our political restrictions - the prevention of chaos in our society all for the pursuit of 'economic growth'...

The other thing, that GOM is still relying on that narrative of survival since independence. Which means, even though we don't have to worry about economics as an existential angst, deep inside his aging mind, I think he still thinks this way. Maybe his mind got stuck in 1965 and has been in this mindset ever since. Or for some other reasons, he still wants to keep us scared about Singapore's survival so he can still use that teeny-weensy bit of fear in us to condition us and whatever nonsense. I think what we are experiencing right now as a nation, is a national existential angst. We no longer need to think about the fear of non-existence in the economic and political sense, so... what else is there left? Maybe the GOM is still trying to keep us scared so maybe his... progenies can survive or some other vested interest. So maybe the narrative of 'terrorism' and 'leadership' crisis.

If the GOM is truly concerned about the survival of this country, he should be thinking about renewable energy and the feasibility of vertical farms right here. Maybe we can use renewable energy to power desalination processes to increase our water independence, and vertical farming to improve our food independence. Maybe we should be investing more in our education to power next-generation industries in recycling technology. Maybe there are good and powerful reasons for our own survival. We still have good people even if the best stay in the US. Maybe, if we can tell them, that Singapore is an exciting place of opportunities from the stringents of a 'crisis' mentality, maybe good things can happen.

Maybe, if the administration is so heavily influenced by the money side of things, the maybe, the government is the wrong place to go for our grievances. Maybe we should be pressuring the global companies, and maybe that will scare the government into doing something. By pressuring I mean, writing letters harassing them, issue threats of boycott, or maybe even just simply persuading them to pressure the government on issues such as education - it might help them make more money - , housing - so they can cut costs when bringing foreigners over - , any single bit that can help them improve the profit margin over the long run, maybe if we can get that message through, it might persuade the govt to enact legislation in the direction that we want. Why not?Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Sphere: Related Content

Friday 11 July 2008

The Future of Knowledge

Before this disappears into some darkness in my mind, I'm going to note it down here.

The future of knowledge is knowledge itself. It sounds like, 'duh', right now, since for example, the future of people is about... 'people' itself.

Or rather, data, or the acquisition of it, will become rather irrelevant, and will probably take second place to the management of the information itself. As it is becoming blindingly obvious, it won't be about the information itself - it won't even be about what the information means - it will be about the relation of some knowledge to other areas of knowledge. It will be about connections, the link of a piece of knowledge to another - that's what the future of knowledge will be about.

On surface, it might seem rather innocuous, but gradually, I believe/hope, universities will begin to think in this direction, and start to think about different areas of knowledge in completely different ways - instead of being separated, I believe it won't be too long before the walls come down, and hopefully - an explosion of explorations, of multidisciplinary research begins.

For now, these are only dreams, but it won't be too long before it becomes reality. I can only hope to be there when it happens - or better yet, making it happen...Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Sphere: Related Content

The Spirit of Learning and the Freedom of Inquiry

Now that I'm in higher education, I thought I would just say something about it.

First of all, constraints.

Since we don't live in a world of infinite abundance, we have to live with constraints. Constraints of material resources, of human resources. With respect to education, it would be great if people could do what they really love to do, but of course there are sometimes, not-so-good teachers/professors, so we're a bit stuck.

Then of course, there are other contraints, of personal disposition, limited ability. We can only do a few things that we are good at. And the tragedy is, sometimes the situation doubly handicaps us - forcing us to do something we're not good at being taught by people not good at teaching.

But anyway, I'm encountering some problems in NUS, that the spirit of learning is badly deficient simply because in Singapore and the obsession for good grades is simply too much. The pragmatist attitude is still rather strong, and it impedes the quality of self-driven learning. I'm still trying to stick to my own generic passion for learning about everything, but there is the other problem that in academia, people don't do crazy things like jumping from biology to sociology to political science, or talk about the intersection of technology, philosophy and political science. It just doesn't happen.

It seems that the world has no taste for multidisciplinary thinkers, at least in academia. But at least the greater world out there needs holistic thinkers, in business, and in analysis. At least, that's what I hope...

Sphere: Related Content